Scientists say people who worry a lot have an
important advantage. If after you've finished a job interview, you
tend to bite your nails to shreds and mentally replay the questions you
fumbled until you've convinced yourself that you absolutely, positively didn't get the job, take heart.
You may have a leg up on everyone else.
Specifically, you may be in a better
position to deal with both good and bad news when it finally arrives.
That's according to new
research led by Kate Sweeny, Ph.D. at the University of
California, Riverside, and cited in The
New York Times. Sweeny and her colleagues wanted to
specifically investigate the effects of worrying while waiting for important,
potentially life-changing results.
So they looked at 230 law school graduates taking
the July 2013 California bar exam, starting two weeks before the exam and
ending soon after the results were released four months later.
Study participants filled out questionnaires at
several points throughout the study period, indicating things like how anxious
they felt and how consumed they were thinking about the exam; how often they
tried to distract themselves or hide their feelings; how confident they felt
that they would pass the exam; and how much time they spent planning to cope
with potential failure.
Results suggested that there were three general
strategies for dealing with the waiting period.
While some people tried to distract themselves and
pretend that they weren't freaking out, others tried to think of a silver
lining to failure. The third group actively anticipated the possibility of
failure. This last strategy is similar to what researchers call "defensive
pessimism," or embracing and preparing for the worst
while still hoping for the best.
Eighty-five percent of participants passed the exam.
The 33 people who failed were asked whether they could believe that they had
failed and whether they could accept the situation. Those who passed were asked
whether they felt relieved.
Two fascinating findings emerged. First,
participants' efforts to distract themselves and hide their feelings weren't
particularly helpful at alleviating their anxiety. In fact, those who tried to
distract themselves often ended up feeling more
anxious.
"Our findings suggest that the advice to 'just
try to distract yourself' or to 'take your mind off it' is not necessarily a
recipe for a distress-free waiting period," the authors write, adding that
"perhaps a better alternative would be to simply experience and express
emotions in a natural way without attempting to suppress them."
Participants who had struggled through the
waiting period were pleasantly surprised when they found out they'd passed.
Second, worrying seemed to be productive.
If they failed, participants who had ruminated and acted
pessimistic during the waiting period "were more motivated to spring into
action, presumably with an eye on retaking the exam at the next available
opportunity," the researchers write. On the other
hand, people who tried to stay positive and optimistic "responded to news
of failure with a sense of disbelief and denial."
If they passed, participants who had struggled
through the waiting period were more pleasantly surprised, while participants
who had made it through easily were relatively underwhelmed.
The researchers say their findings "reveal an
emotional trade-off." Whether you're waiting to hear back about a job or
an academic exam, worrying for a few weeks or months may predict a better
experience receiving the results.
In other words, don't worry about worrying; know
that you're engaging in a totally natural process that may even be productive
in the long run.
curled from Businessinsider
No comments:
Post a Comment